During the "Health in Buildings Roundtable" sponsored by the NIH (National Health Institute) & co-organized by the US CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) and several other organizations, Dr. Martin Pall from the Washington State University (WSU) concluded that the "5G rollout is absolutely insane".
Stop it! Stop it right now! Stop 5G! We need to have time to truly rein in the insanity of the telecommunications industry. Money exchanged for the damage to health and the environment is inexcusable and must be stopped.
Senator Patrick Colbeck Testifies Against the deployment of 5G because of the reported health effects from wireless technologies in a hearing 2018.
FCC to determine health exposure is wrong and inappropriate. It is not by the CDC or Department of Health.
Stop 5G! Talk to your legislator now!
5G without toxocological tests from the public health department is absolutely insane.
Stop 5G! Replace it with fiber optics the best form and fastest communication and no electromagnetic fields. Use cell phones only for phone calls. Create safe healthy environment for people and the geosphere.
Keep in mind the telecommunications industry is the most powerful industry in the world. With 6 billion cell phones users in the world telecom companies bring in trillions of dollars a year.
The Double Whammy Calamity –
Planet Earth’s Biosphere in Grave Danger
We are all becoming aware of the dangers of cell phones. Keep the phone away from the head to avoid brain tumors and keep it out of your pocket to avoid low sperm count for men and keep it away from the breast for women.
News reports are asking: Why is 80% of the insect population declining, even in protected environments? It seems that while we focus on all the harm being incurred to ourselves from electromagnetic radiation we are ignoring the well-established science of the effects EMFs have on the ecology of the planet- the effects on the biosphere, the ultra-thin covering of the planet where life exists.
Life originated in an environment of a geomagnetic field while at the same time being exposed to the influence of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Within the last 120 years the exposure has grown dramatically. More recently EMF exposure has become a serious hazard to health. One finds the entire world now using cell phones, estimates of 5 billion users. In the USA more than 300 million cell phone subscribers.
The increase of exposure has just begun, exponentially increasing with the developments of 5G networks. This development is not only on the ground where exposure will be increased to cell towers every 500 feet, it will also be in space. The plans are to send over 20,000 satellites with multiple antennas surrounding the earth enveloping it in RF-EMF frequencies by the US alone. The genetic, neurological and oxidative damage are so significant that it must be stopped while life on the planet reconsiders the direction required to protect health from this new hazard pushed forward by the telecommunications industry.
20,000 Satellites for 5G to be Launched Sending Focused Beams of Intense Microwave Radiation Over Entire Earth
This means the entire Biosphere will be exposed beyond one’s imagination by the electromagnetic fields from satellite communication, wireless communication and Wi-Fi technology.
We are already seeing its effects. Studies have reported the effects from EMFs were highest for plants (90%) and insects (90%), lower for birds (70%), other vertebrates (50%) and other organisms (50%). Even though the RF-EMF exposures were low and non-thermal, the effects to plants appeared as wounded, cut or burned.
Hazard of Electromagnetic Fields in Biosphere by Marko S. Markov
Also the human population is severely being effected. A portion of the population are now electrically sensitive and the list of symptoms is long and unspecific since individual sensitivity is encoded in our genetic diversity. Tragically these effects are only denied when it affects the interests of the wireless industry and all it players.
Stop 5G! Stop it right now! Contact your congress person.
It is 1982. The phone rings and you answer it. You never think twice about its safety. It’s the innovative “touch tone” telephone that over the last twenty years has outpaced the older rotary dial telephone. At the other end is someone talking to you; it’s the miracle of communication.
A few years pass and the “pager” becomes the fashion. It is now the 1990’s and over 60 million people throughout the world use “pagers.” Within an instance of time they become obsolete as the cell phone becomes popular and the smart phone emerges taking over how we communicate.
By 2017 over 216 million iPhones are sold throughout the world. The Android and other phones take an even larger market share and now within the US alone we see over 300million cellular phone users being exposed endlessly to high levels of EMFs rarely experienced before this age of communication.
Most users can’t imagine a life without their cellphone, talking, texting, posting pictures and sharing comments, looking up a fact, a direction, keeping details, their shopping lists, their bank accounts, shopping online, paying their bills, reading books, seeing films, and much more.
Everyday you can find users bent over, staring at their screen, precariously walking as they stare hard at their phone’s screen, or sitting at a table with a friend, each silently looking at their screens rather than each other. Be it daytime or nighttime, checking their screens, addicted to a dopamine loop deep within their cognition as described by a study at Harvard University (Science in the News, 2018, Trevor Haynes).
Cellphone wireless communication is based on microwaves, which are invisible and rarely felt unless they are amped up to the cooking range. These microwaves are called electromagnetic fields (EMFs). For years they have been used and studied.
The waves are also used for radar. Because of their long time use in radar we know a lot about their effects on health. A highly regarded expert in the field of microwaves is Barrie Tower who gave a 26 page testimony in a civil action against the Portland Public Schools use of Wi-Fi. He became involved in this area after he found out that the power densities and frequencies used for Wi-Fi in schools were similar to those used as weapons during the Cold War.
His testimony covers documentation from government records. For example, in 1971 “the US Naval Medical Research Institute (NMRI) referenced 2300 research articles listing in excess of 120 impairments and illnesses attributed to radiofrequency and microwave radiation.”
Another study was done by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) in 1975 which warned all of its personnel of the risk from low level microwaves including illnesses ranging from microwave sickness (flu like symptoms, depression, suicidal tendencies) to cancer and leukemia.
His conclusion was to suggest using a cable or fiber optics for internet use. He was aware that “WI-FI is backed and financed by the most powerful industry on the planet…an industry that apparently does not have to prove its product is safe. Incredibly, the public is rather told to prove it is not!”
Our exposure is at levels never before imagined and they are causing a multitude of health problems. Electric Sensitivity (ES), has become a recognized illness throughout the world that now in 2019 finds 6 billion people using cell phones. The only time it is denied is when it affects the interests of the wireless communications industry whose profits must be enormous. Imagine 6 billion multiplied by monthly charges over a years time- several trillion dollars!
1990's For Health Today?
The headline: Frequency used by 1990s cell phones linked to cancer in rats, study finds
After 10 years and 30 million dollars the National Toxicology Program released a study not about now. The study is not based on recent use and exposure of cell phones but based upon RFR exposure from 2G and 3G cell phones. That is considered ancient technology. Back in 1990 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had determined that above 5 milligauss there would be problems with cellular metabolism, but little more came of it. Instead the industry did their best to keep information out of the public mainstream.
How many of us are using those old phones today? Most people are on 4G phones and these are not just phones, but as smart phones, miniature cell phone towers - always connected to the internet.
So, back 25 to 30 years ago usage the researchers found a connection between the use of those old cellphones and cancerous heart, brain and adrenal tumors in male rats, remaining unclear whether female rats and mice were used in the study.
"We believe that the link between radio frequency radiation and tumors in male rats is real," John Bucher, a senior scientist at NTP, said in a statement. He added that external experts agreed with the finding. The studies didn't look into the kinds of RFR used for WiFi or 5G networks.
All that money and not looking at the present? Now the FCC will use this study to monitor the potential effects of RFR? Rather ridiculous don't you think! Especially with the huge push and leap into the 5G networks and the enormous exposure we all face daily just sitting next to our neighbor while they stare at their screen.
"5G is an emerging technology that hasn't really been defined yet," lead toxicologist Michael Wyde said in the statement. "From what we currently understand, it likely differs dramatically from what we studied.*"
Well isn't that wonderful, we begin again the experiment on humanity without knowing what effects our current 4G addiction and future 5G has on health while spending 30 million dollars to keep scientific research in the early days of limited exposure.
But we do have an idea what it does. Here's a clever description of its use by by Bridget Carey using a pool table and a dart board at the end of this blog.
5G does differ dramatically and is not attractive at all. Neighborhoods covered with large power supply units and antennas everywhere - all to eliminate wages for drivers. Driverless cars represent the end to taxi and Uber earnings for people. What happens to truck drivers and delivery trucks? The major employment of men is driving. As for health, the aim is 35 megahertz, a danger zone that with a little effort approaches the military 95 megahertz Active Denial System and more also here.
Most important is the extent of harm, disease and death from the ultimate exposure of these millimeter waves to all of us. Please read this timely article from last year when California fought off the 5G take-over - Cell Tower Hypocrisy
*The exposure levels and lengths were also greater in the studies. The lowest exposure level was the same as the maximum exposure allowed for cell phone users, a power level that "rarely occurs with typical cell phone use," according to the NTP statement. The highest exposure level used in the studies was four times greater than the maximum power level allowed.
In the studies, the rats were exposed to RFR starting from when they were in the womb. Mice were exposed beginning at 5 or 6 weeks old. The animals were exposed for up to two years, for about nine hours a day (with 10 minutes of exposure and 10-minute breaks in between). The RFR levels in the studies ranged from 1.5-6 watts per kilogram in rats, and 2.5-10 watts per kilogram in mice.
This is my new mantra, one I learned from my daughter during the Loma Prieta earthquake back in 1989 when the house was shaking and we stood under the doorway holding on to each other while she’s yelling in my ear, “Stop it! Stop it right now!” Something she learned in school.
So the other morning it came to me. This is the mantra of the 5G age. Stop it right now! Don’t waste the money. I know it’s billions of dollars of new phone business. But we already know that phones have become such a double edged sword that they are ruining health, impacting future generations, and psychologically messing with everyone in a negative way. Let's go easy on the phones- you already know what I mean.
So, “Stop It! Stop It Right Now!”
Consider this, telecom companies are spending fortunes for wireless, devoted to how wonderful 5G is. An article on CNET is titled, Why rural areas can't catch a break on speedy broadband- Everyone agrees on the mission to connect more people. But no one can agree on how to do it.- By Marguerite Reardon, October 23, 2018
In her article she talks at length about the plans and promises of 5G networks. She also provides an insight into an alternative, a solution, for me, a needed political action.
Tried and true technology
For decades, much of the work the FCC has done in getting broadband to rural America has centered on providing subsidies and incentives to traditional phone companies. Most Americans, including those living in rural parts of the country, rely on various flavors of fixed broadband infrastructures, such as DSL or cable modem service. The lucky few are able to get access to fiber, which is considered the gold standard in broadband because it provides near limitless capacity.
But pushing fiber closer to customers or directly to their door is expensive. An FCC report authored by Paul de Sa, former chief of the FCC's Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis under then-FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, estimated it would take $40 billion to expand internet access to cover 98 percent of Americans and another $40 billion to deliver broadband to 100 percent of the US population.
While fiber is the ideal, it's unlikely Congress will come up with an additional $40 billion to $80 billion to pay for it. That's where wireless comes in.
This is why government and democracy are so important. So do you want to continue paying out of your pocket to private companies or do you want to see your tax dollars spent on yourself instead of bank bailouts.
We can actively have our legislators introduce and vote for such solutions and prevent a health catastrophe waiting to happen. Otherwise, by continuing on our path of wireless electromagnetic frequency exposure to ourselves and the environment we will be creating in our lifetime and for those generations to come such health costs that will bankrupt and ruin this country.
Now is the time to act, we must protect our children and our environment. Asked about 5G? --- “STOP IT! STOP IT RIGHT NOW!” -Go fiber optics throughout the country.
Truth is bandied around in the media as though commentators know its definition. But its not really "truth" they are talking about. What they mean to say is the word "context". We also hear the new term, "alternative facts." What they really mean is again, "context."
So existence is existence, but we as human beings experience different perceptions of existence and those experiences create our reality. You perceive the world is flat, then it is your contention it is flat, and your reality, your truth in context is the world is flat. When you see a satellite photo of the earth as a sphere your perception changes and your new reality is the world is a sphere and the context of your truth changes.
Was the sphere there all along? Yes, but our new perception, "spheres" over shadows our previous "flat" perception of the world. That is a more clear definition of progress, when our perception of reality comes closer to what exists.
What exists is influenced by us, but in ways that do not change the essence of existence. What it does do is change behavior, actions, our inner core of what we believe and the karmic events that follow in the nature of all things connected to us. So our behavior has far reaching implications and moral and ethical responsibilities.
Sometimes we do stupid things like blow up atom bombs on the desert while standing there reacting to the shock waves of brilliant white light and thunderous sounds while in milliseconds we receive enough gamma rays to easily kill us immediately or create bazaar illness later in life.
Hopefully, if we survive, homeostasis desired by our body will continue to perform tremendous biological and genetic repairs to resume life. However, for the pregnant woman, the fetus is in grave danger as it immediately reacts to the gamma rays. Its epigenetic forces are in a gathering mode influencing the DNA 's building of the structure and essence of life.
Waves, longitudinal waves, are a part and parcel of our being and daily lives. These waves are our electromagnetic forces that are essential to life, to change, and to stability. They are at the other end of the spectrum to gamma rays and our body does not have a protective shield against them, rather we possess antennas throughout. Unlike the blood brain barrier that protects the nervous system from many toxins, there is no barrier for emf radiation. As such we are in harms way non-stop with exposure day and night from electromagnetic fields.
Our exposure today is millions of times greater than fifty years ago. Are we paying attention to this invisible force and how it affects our daily life? This is the new reality we are faced with, this new perception that impacts our lives and needs our attention and response. It is our immediate and important karmic duty. Our behavior and comprehension of our present environment affects those in the womb and health in the future.
Received an email I wish to share:
I went to your blog and read. It was very interesting and quite disturbing. If implemented the way you describe, it will only be a matter of time until all people can be controlled/killed with this infrastructure. Or just end up sick... Neither are desirable. Is there anything that can reasonably be done to prevent this? I would like to follow your blog and read more, but haven't done that before and didn't see how I might sign up.
Also, I would like to know how may I measure EMFs in my home? I really need to know what levels exist, especially since I am now here many more hours than before and there is a tower nearby. I have one household Rayguard device, but may need another or need to move it around with me. ???
Don't mean to overly excite by the blog. I do mean to share some of my experience and concerns for people's health. The main concern regarding the tower nearby is to take measurements to see if the EMF and RF frequencies are strong within your home. If they are, there are easy ways to protect anyone within the building. Generally walls are sufficient to reduce harm, though it appears 5G does do so easily at short ranges- but windows can allow heavy exposure and can be shielded with a clear sheet coating made in Switzerland and available from Safe Living Technologies- www.slt.co They are a Canadian company that also sell good measuring instruments. Their ME 3830B M/E Analyzer is a good investment. Something inexpensive is the simple Ghost Meter found on Amazon.com for EMFs only and is quite accurate.
The most important thing is to avoid home wireless routers and wireless phones, plus reducing iphone use as much as possible. My next two blogs reflect some observations from my recent jury duty that you might find interesting.
The RayGuard Mobil units is ideal for travel and to keep as a constant companion to reduce exposure. Still it may not be sufficient during sleeping hours if there is a wireless network and router being used during sleeping time. Turn it off and enjoy a much better sleep and rising.
My own sensitivities are so great that a wireless router during sleep causes optic images and brain static along with a tightening of the jaw. Wouldn't wish that on anyone.
It is time to get politically motivated and at least let your concerns be heard by your congressional representatives, most of whom are in the dark regarding this ongoing crisis and impending acceleration of exposure.
There are some excellent books to read. One of my favorites is An Electronic Spring by Katie Singer. Other excellent books are Over Powered by Martin Blank, PhD, Dirty Electricity by Samual Milham, MD, PhD, Zapped by Ann Louise Gittleman and others in my library.
In the right column is a RSS Feed which allows you to get updates for this blog.
Thanks for your letter!
til later, Michael
As I mentioned earlier in one of the Blogs. I was on jury duty. And what a difference! Amazing as we all went for our well deserved 15 minute break. The jury selection is a long prodigious process necessary to come up with as much as possible fair minded jurors.
So here we all are, well except for my solitary pacing up and down the hall taking in all the nuances of the speckled floor around the drinking fountains, the endless series of fluorescent lights, the cameras and antennas., the small shells petrified in the sandstone walls.
Everyone, literally everyone, every single body in the hallway for 15 minutes straight remained motionless- that's about 55 people! Not one word was uttered once, and no one looked at anyone else. Amazing, so totally different than a few years ago when jury duty called out to me. It's a citizen's obligation and though it's a pain, it's also a privilege.
So there soon appeared a strange smile on my face that came from nowhere. This is comedy material of the highest order! It was like a time warp cartoon in which all human activity ceases as everyone stares, hunched over, peering at their telephone screens. It must be so utterly fascinating. But it wasn't really something to smile about and a bit of shame for seeing the humor and sadness came over me, not unlike...
“I feel tremendous guilt,” admitted Chamath Palihapitiya, former Vice President of User Growth at Facebook, to an audience of Stanford students. He was responding to a question about his involvement in exploiting consumer behavior. “The short-term, dopamine-driven feedback loops that we have created are destroying how society works,”
(my addition, when the phone is missing) About 73% of people claim to experience this unique flavor of anxiety, which makes sense when you consider that adults in the US spend an average of 2-4 hours per day tapping, typing, and swiping on their devices—that adds up to over 2,600 daily touches. - from Science in the News, Harvard University
How much exposure does that produce to our eyes, and body. One time an employee said to me she was having a strange ailment with her right index finger. It had become red and slightly swollen. The first question that came to mind was, do you text? Immediately she made the connection because she always did and her immediate response was NO, NO I will not give up texting! End of conversation.
til later, Michael
Caveat emptor! A real mix-up of purpose is taking place. It is using everything in its unrelenting power to determine our future...
Spent last week on jury duty. It was a criminal case. The judge went to great length explaining to we prospective jurors the great fundamental right "innocent until proven guilty", and the right of a defendant not to be required to give testimony as stated in the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution.
This constitutional protection is part of our essence and flows from English Common Law. This is not the case in other parts of the world, for example Napoleonic Law, a person accused of a crime is presumed guilty and must prove his innocence.
Due to our proclivity to transfer concepts into other areas of reason, we view positive information of progress with its assurance of safety as presumed fact. If there is any criticism there needs to be proof of harm. Sort of like 5G is safe progress/innocent until proven dangerous/guilty. Proving dangerous is difficult and takes time.
On the other hand, in Europe something as new as 5G network must first prove safety because it is outside the realm of experience. Therefore, 5G is dangerous/guilty until proven safe/innocent. Proving safety is difficult and takes time. So here we have two different approaches.
5G represent wave lengths and not people, persons, or individuals as protected by the US Constitution. However, you would think so by what is called the "promotional spin" used in business to get their product accepted and used long before studies are made on safety.
The "promotional spin" from tele-corporations spins anything and everything, scientific data, future benefits, safety, proclaiming how wonderful life will be affected, morphing into the best, most, latest, and safest. It goes direct to the media and the government spinning its story non-stop.
To mitigate this "spin" science has come up with a new term, "the precautionary principle". It attempts to take the dangerous and safe perspectives and allow testing, data, and accuracy to reveal the existence of safety or harm long before the use and establishment. This takes time, meanwhile the wheels of the tele-corporations are at work getting governmental approval.
Studying 5G network for safety by the government is not happening. Tests have already shown an increase in cancer for firemen at stations using 5G networks, yet this seems to be ignored when huge sums of money come into overshadow harm. The promotional spin is in full tilt throughout media way ahead of the precautionary principle. We are faced with something new and presented as safe with the burden to prove unsafe upon those who suffer harm. 5G is being pushed upon us forcefully by the CTIA. The telecommunications industry is once again determining our new reality whether we want it or not. Beware.