As I mentioned earlier in one of the Blogs. I was on jury duty. And what a difference! Amazing as we all went for our well deserved 15 minute break. The jury selection is a long prodigious process necessary to come up with as much as possible fair minded jurors.

So here we all are, well except for my solitary pacing up and down the hall taking in all the nuances of the speckled floor around the drinking fountains, the endless series of fluorescent lights, the cameras and antennas., the small shells petrified in the sandstone walls.

Everyone, literally everyone, every single body in the hallway for 15 minutes straight remained motionless- that's about 55 people! Not one word was uttered once, and no one looked at anyone else. Amazing, so totally different than a few years ago when jury duty called out to me. It's a citizen's obligation and though it's a pain, it's also a privilege.

So there soon appeared a strange smile on my face that came from nowhere. This is comedy material of the highest order! It was like a time warp cartoon in which all human activity ceases as everyone stares, hunched over, peering at their telephone screens. It must be so utterly fascinating. But it wasn't really something to smile about and a bit of shame for seeing the humor and sadness came over me, not unlike...

         “I feel tremendous guilt,” admitted Chamath Palihapitiya, former Vice President of User Growth at Facebook, to an audience of Stanford students. He was  responding to a question about his involvement in exploiting consumer behavior. “The short-term, dopamine-driven feedback loops that we have created are destroying how society works,”
(my addition, when the phone is missing) About 73% of people claim to experience this unique flavor of anxiety, which makes sense when you consider that adults in the US spend an average of 2-4 hours per day tapping, typing, and swiping on their devices—that adds up to over 2,600 daily touches. - from Science in the News, Harvard University

How much exposure does that produce to our eyes, and body. One time an employee said to me she was having a strange ailment with her right index finger. It had become red and slightly swollen. The first question that came to mind was, do you text? Immediately she made the connection because she always did and her immediate response was NO, NO I will not give up texting! End of conversation.

til later, Michael

Caveat emptor! A real mix-up of purpose is taking place. It is using everything in its unrelenting power to determine our future...

Spent last week on jury duty. It was a criminal case. The judge went to great length explaining to we prospective jurors the great fundamental right "innocent until proven guilty", and the right of a defendant not to be required to give testimony as stated in the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution.

This constitutional protection is part of our essence and flows from English Common Law. This is not the case in other parts of the world, for example Napoleonic Law, a person accused of a crime is presumed guilty and must prove his innocence.

Due to our proclivity to transfer concepts into other areas of reason, we view positive information of progress with its assurance of safety as presumed fact. If there is any criticism there needs to be proof of harm. Sort of like 5G is safe progress/innocent until proven dangerous/guilty. Proving dangerous is difficult and takes time.

On the other hand, in Europe something as new as 5G network must first prove safety because it is outside the realm of experience. Therefore, 5G is dangerous/guilty until proven safe/innocent. Proving safety is difficult and takes time. So here we have two different approaches.

5G represent wave lengths and not people, persons, or individuals as protected by the US Constitution. However, you would think so by what is called the "promotional spin" used in business to get their product accepted and used long before studies are made on safety.

The "promotional spin" from tele-corporations spins anything and everything, scientific data, future benefits, safety, proclaiming how wonderful life will be affected, morphing into the best, most, latest, and safest. It goes direct to the media and the government spinning its story non-stop.

To mitigate this "spin" science has come up with a new term, "the precautionary principle". It attempts to take the dangerous and safe perspectives and allow testing, data, and accuracy to reveal the existence of safety or harm long before the use and establishment. This takes time, meanwhile the wheels of the tele-corporations are at work getting governmental approval.

Studying 5G network for safety by the government is not happening. Tests have already shown an increase in cancer for firemen at stations using 5G networks, yet this seems to be ignored when huge sums of money come into overshadow harm. The promotional spin is in full tilt throughout media  way ahead of the precautionary principle. We are faced with something new and presented as safe with the burden to prove unsafe upon those who suffer harm. 5G is being pushed upon us forcefully by the CTIA. The telecommunications industry is once again determining our new reality whether we want it or not. Beware.

til later,
Michael

Yes, be aware and beware of the major 500 billion dollar telecommunications industry takeover. As you listen to Phil Matier's commentary on what's happening for the future, take stock that it's coming, even if it's not supposed to come. Neither is global warming supposed to come. Ethics lie in the deed that is done. It is the treatment of each other where ethics finds its place.

There are many uses of the 5G network, such as the military's Active Denial System at 95 gigahertz. Let's not be shortsighted thinking only of the 5G networks ability to speed nano seconds off your entertaining videos or direct driver-less taxis and delivery trucks. 5G is at the far end of the blue spectrum of light. That's the dangerous end of light where the further you go, you end up with a simple 5 watt laser beam that can burn a whole through thick steel plates in moments. These wave lengths are not toys and the telecommunication industry wishes to allow up to 60 gigahertz of power in the 5G networks. 

                  "The human body has between two million to four million sweat ducts. Dr. Ben-Ishai of Hebrew University, Israel explains that our sweat ducts act like “an array of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths,” meaning that we become more conductive. A recent New York study which experimented with 60GHz waves stated that “the analyses of penetration depth show that more than 90% of the transmitted power is absorbed in the epidermis and dermis layer.” The effects of MMWs as studied by Dr. Yael Stein of Hebrew University is said to also cause humans physical pain as our nociceptors flare up in recognition of the wave as a damaging stimuli. So we’re looking at possibilities of many skin diseases and cancer as well as physical pain to our skin." from-  5G Radiation Dangers – 11 Reasons To Be Concerned

So with atomic energy we get the atomic bomb, with 5G network we get blistering fast telecommunications and the ability to microwave and cook people. And the FCC is allowing 5G phones to come to market that will have an effective radiated power that is ten times as high as for 4G phones, but that's not what the 5G sites say. And 4G phone companies are already paying out on lawsuits for brain tumors. Once full disclosure happens those lawsuits could start to gather in many more ailments that are brushed off as anything but that.
til later,
Michael