Disaster and the Precautionary Principle

 I sell RayGuard products. Nothing else.

EMF/RF radiation is what I research. Its increased intensity is the most important health issue facing us. Its perception is mysterious. Its uncontrolled exposure levels through Wi-Fi are disastrous.

Electromagnetic radiation is our life force. It is the mini volts of electrical magnetic energy that prove we are alive and functioning. It is necessary for all living creatures. All elements respond to its force.

Electromagnetic radiation appears to be the force that holds our galaxy and the universe together.

As necessary as it is to life, electromagnetic radiation can be destructive with dangerous biological results. These harmful effects are only now being able to trace back to EMF/RF exposure.

In the United States electrical engineers are the only recognized authorities by the United States government to determine the health effects of electromagnetic radiation. The Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers (IEEE) get this authority through the Telecommunications Act 0f 1996. They have maintained through time that the same exposure levels are safe based on their tests.
 
Electrical and electronics engineers do not measure the biology of the body. They do not measure the effects of EMF/RF radiation on nerves and cells as measured by doctors and scientists.
 
The IEEE maintains there is no harm at present levels, whereas, scientists and medical researchers and professional maintain harm exists. There is confusion regarding evidence of harm.

First, there is a difference between human effects and biological effects. Biological effects are defined by biological studies. Human effects are defined by Health Studies. Health Studies require a certain protocol, a control group and a group exposed to the pollutant being studied.
 
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) label EMF/RF radiation as a pollutant as does every wireless manufacturer.
 
There are no human health studies of EMF/RF radiation harm and for a good reason. Over 17,000 biological studies recognize that EMF/RF radiation exposure produces leukemia, cancer, oxidative damage, DNA damage, major cellular leakage resulting in a cascade of harm, and many major mental and suicidal problems.
 
Therefore, no human Health Study can be performed since biologically it is already proven that exposure causes cancer. Exposing a group under such known facts is forbidden by law. It would be grossly unethical.

However, unintentionally, we have amassed a large data base of human effects:

• 1971 “the U.S. Naval Medical Research Institute (NMRI) 2,300 research articles listing in excess of 120 impairments and illnesses attributed to radio-frequency and microwave radiation.”
• 1975 Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) warned all personnel of the risk from low level microwaves, flu like symptoms, depression, suicidal tendencies, cancer and leukemia.
• Recent cancer clusters experienced by students and teachers in schools
• Recent health problems of firemen has been shown to result from exposure to EMF/RF radiation resulting in California law exempting fire stations from cell towers. This was a 17 year fight.

 
No insurance company will insure the wireless industry for medical harm due to wireless exposure.
 
By 2020 it is projected that twenty thousand satellites will be encircling the earth sending out 5 million watts per satellite upon the earth's surface, as well as drones manufactured in Hawaii the size of football fields loaded with 5G antennas, and hundreds of thousands of new surface satellites 200 to 400 feet apart with focused 5G millimeter waves.
 
We face an environment where there is no way to opt out and there is no informed consent.
It is urgent to implement the Precautionary Principle and place a moratorium on cell towers, satellite EMF/RF emissions, and use of drones for Wi-Fi transmission as being developed in Hawaii.

There is a Federal preemption, upholding Article 25 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act which the wireless industry has used to protect their position against communities, cities, health organizations and medical organizations that have objected to the placement of wireless towers.
.
However, when imminent harm is a proven fact by biological studies a more important relief to society exists. The Precautionary Principle must be followed above all else based on its two rules.
 
One, it is not preemptive; therefore, Article 25 cannot stand in its way.
 
Second, it is not conditional. Therefore, there are no conditions restraining its action. It is there for the sole purpose to protect society from abuse, danger and harm.
 
Medical and scientific authorities recognize the present danger and state it must be reduced a thousand fold. This is sufficient argument to enact the Precautionary Principle.
 
I sell RayGuard products to provide some relief to those electrically sensitive who are exposed to the high levels allowed by our government of EMF/RF exposure.
 
Michael